|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
May 1, 2010, 09:12 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 29, 2004
Location: Brisbane
Favorite Player: Rafique & Pailot
Posts: 6,335
|
|
I have already discussed about Nayeem in my previous posts. If you consider Nayeem's batting technique/style/approach/SR in ODI, you can get the idea that he is not a T20 middle-order/finisher. If the selectors do not get it with their experience, no one can help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaseer
Lets look at his scores in practice matches.
Against Barbados: He came to the crease at 16.1 over, scored 9* from 10 balls without any boundary. Another example of his trade mark "not out" innings.
Against England: He came to crease at 10.3 overs, scored 9 from 12 balls, again without any boundary. Different scenario compare to the 1st match, but same outcome.
|
++
Against Pakistan: 10* of 9, came to crease at 16th over when the match was still on, Another example of his trade mark "not out" innings.
Do not blame Nayeem actually. He is not capable of what team is asking from him in T20.
Mushfiq, he is a proven failure in T20. Still selectors picked him.
|
May 1, 2010, 10:15 PM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 27,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger444
but who are the solutions then?
|
junaid, nazimuddin, alok should be in t20 in place of riad, naeem and imrul
|
May 1, 2010, 11:03 PM
|
|
Cricket Guru
|
|
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Location: Connecticut, USA
Favorite Player: All the BD players
Posts: 8,793
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by offstump
junaid, nazimuddin, alok should be in t20 in place of riad, naeem and imrul
|
I always wanted zunaed instead of imrul actually..you and the others probably know that offstump..i made a thread 4 that issue..I had a bad feeling that Imrul would really struggle against quality fast bowling which happened..he earned being in the team but doubt he should be in the starting X!..zunaed wouldve been a huge threat with the bat 2day..hes not the greatest with pace but hes much better then kayes..the problem with alok was that he was doing bad in the dpl and ncl..by the time he performed in the T20's the squad was already selected..and the icl performances was a little while ago and so I dont blame the selectors there..well you want 2 substitute 2 middle order batsmen with 2 top order batsmen? Dont know if that would be a good idea but I respect that idea..
|
May 1, 2010, 11:10 PM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: April 29, 2010
Location: ∞
Favorite Player: Nasir Hossain
Posts: 1,339
|
|
What we need is a second Tamim Iqbal at lower down the order who can smash with ruthless power lol and if you just look around most teams have a man placed on that 6th 5th position like that.
west indies have pollard
NZ got oram
england had flintoff
pak had afridi but i guess he will be promoted now but you get my point.
__________________
৺
|
May 1, 2010, 11:52 PM
|
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: April 14, 2006
Location: New Jersey
Favorite Player: Mash, Moyna, Cutter, Task
Posts: 1,270
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jahidus200
i dont understand what the hell bcb thinking by not picking alok kopali for 2020 team . this 3 guys are lots worst player than alok kopali .this guy naeem he seems to be doesnt know how to play cricket sometimes. naeem has to remember this is 2020 , only 120 ball to play . even sometimes naeem knows that he has to hit but he dont even try sometimes . because he dont wanna get out . this is selfish cricket . i think alok kopali deserve a chance intead of this three player . and musfiq and kayes even tho they playing 2020 they think they playing 50 over game in west indies .
|
cuz our selectors are sorry dumb sons of *******
__________________
Life is a bizarre thing, it tests you first and teaches you afterwards.
|
May 2, 2010, 12:11 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Dale Willem Steyn
Posts: 2,481
|
|
We could win yesterday if Alok Kapali & Aftab Ahmed were there? Seems like that!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Cricket is the Passion
|
May 2, 2010, 01:25 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Location: somewhere in the GaLaXy
Favorite Player: TIGERS !!
Posts: 5,039
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imteaz
We could win yesterday if Alok Kapali & Aftab Ahmed were there? Seems like that!!!!!!!!!!
|
Agree totally, also Add Johorul in place of Mushy. Mushy is not ready yet for this version !!
__________________
GO BANGLADESH GO!!!
------------------------------
Fav.Int.Players: Sachin/Lara/Sir.viv/Ponting/Ambrose/W.Akram/R.Hadlee
|
May 2, 2010, 01:31 AM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 17,886
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imteaz
We could win yesterday if Alok Kapali & Aftab Ahmed were there? Seems like that!!!!!!!!!!
|
can you guarantee that?? If Alok and Aftab was coming in after shakib and ashraful we certainly would have had a better chance of winning than we did today, but having a chance of winning and really winning is not the same, is it. today ashraful and shakib, say next match they will fail and alok and aftab will click, what then we are back to square 1 all over again. you can't really guarantee much with our batting or bowling line up. all we have is a Chance of doing doing something, weather we will totally do it or not is a a completely different question.
__________________
"I was the happiest man in the world, happier than Bill Gates"- Tamim Iqbal
|
May 2, 2010, 03:44 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Dale Willem Steyn
Posts: 2,481
|
|
Jahhhhhhh. Bollam ek kotha public bojhe ar ek kotha. Sorry guys lekha (type) ta comments er moto hoe gese. Ebhabe lekha uchit hoi nai.
I didn't mean that. But if anyone believe like that than it's ok.
We only could win yesterday if our team got some more professionalism. Alok and Aftab didn't prove anything that we can consider them as match winner. 1/2 extra ordinary innings???? Well, Ashraful, Shakib and Tamim has better innings than those two. They failed. And Aftab and Alok didn't do anything better than Naeem or Mahmudullah in recent past. Personal choice cannot be the criteria to be in national team. ICL and NCL T20 is not that high standard by which we can ignore international performer.
Again Sorry Guys.
__________________
Cricket is the Passion
Last edited by Imteaz; May 2, 2010 at 03:53 AM..
|
May 2, 2010, 11:08 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2010
Location: Bangladesh
Favorite Player: Shakib, SN, Tamim
Posts: 1,205
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imteaz
We could win yesterday if Alok Kapali & Aftab Ahmed were there? Seems like that!!!!!!!!!!
|
Ofcourse, amader team combination extremely bazey
|
May 2, 2010, 11:10 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2010
Location: Bangladesh
Favorite Player: Shakib, SN, Tamim
Posts: 1,205
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bangladesh_sy
can you guarantee that?? If Alok and Aftab was coming in after shakib and ashraful we certainly would have had a better chance of winning than we did today, but having a chance of winning and really winning is not the same, is it. today ashraful and shakib, say next match they will fail and alok and aftab will click, what then we are back to square 1 all over again. you can't really guarantee much with our batting or bowling line up. all we have is a Chance of doing doing something, weather we will totally do it or not is a a completely different question.
|
Apnar ki mone hoi je Riad, Mushy, Naeem ebong Shuvo amaderke jitate pare.
|
May 2, 2010, 11:23 AM
|
|
Cricket Savant
|
|
Join Date: December 23, 2007
Location: The Quiet Place
Favorite Player: Curtly Ambrose
Posts: 27,469
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK420
Apnar ki mone hoi je Riad, Mushy, Naeem ebong Shuvo amaderke jitate pare.
|
yes. if the target in 20 overs is 75
|
May 2, 2010, 11:27 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2010
Location: Bangladesh
Favorite Player: Shakib, SN, Tamim
Posts: 1,205
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by offstump
yes. if the target in 20 overs is 75
|
That is highly unlikely
|
May 2, 2010, 11:28 AM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 5, 2010
Location: Bangladesh
Favorite Player: Shakib, SN, Tamim
Posts: 1,205
|
|
Naeem is a selfish cricketer
|
May 2, 2010, 12:18 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: January 4, 2010
Posts: 1,170
|
|
Abdur Razzaks career was finished after he went for correcting his action. He doesnt deserve to play for the team.
And why take this good for nothing Shuvo ??? he didnt bat or bowl in the last game.
Aftab should have been used instead of this piece of garbage Shuvo.
Naem and Mushfiq doesnt seem suited for the 20/20 version.
All the spinners bowled out of line. Pathetic.
|
May 2, 2010, 01:56 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 17,886
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK420
Apnar ki mone hoi je Riad, Mushy, Naeem ebong Shuvo amaderke jitate pare.
|
if you are going to reply to my comment then reply with what i'm talking about. where do you see me saying that I said Riyad, Mushy, Naeem is going to make us win???
__________________
"I was the happiest man in the world, happier than Bill Gates"- Tamim Iqbal
|
May 2, 2010, 08:43 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Favorite Player: Ashraful♥Raqibul foreve
Posts: 1,063
|
|
To be frank, Naeem, Mushfiq and Riyadh are quality players but we can only afford to have one of them in our T20 squad. The reason being they play similar cricket, it takes them time to settle down, they are perfect for number 4 position, out of these 3, Riyadh is more consistent than the other two. So he gets the nod. About Imrul, screw him, he doesn't deserve to be anywhere near our T20 squad. I hope Tait sends the bodmaish into hashpatal.
1. Nazimuddin / Junaid S (whoever is in boss form)
2. Tamim Iqbal
3. M. Ashraful (trumpcard)
4. Riyadh
5. Shuvagoto Hom Chowd
6. Shakib al Hasan (he can be our finisher like Lance Klusener on good days, bad days = C. Martin)
7. Alok Kapali
8. Jahurul Islam (or any other keeper with a higher s.rate than Mushy)
9. Dollar Mahmud (Mash leaks the same amount of runs in T20, Dollar has better hitting capabilities against pacers)
10. Shafiul Islam
11. Rubel Hossain / Mashrafe Mortaza
|
May 3, 2010, 12:47 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Dale Willem Steyn
Posts: 2,481
|
|
So Daring!!!!!!!
__________________
Cricket is the Passion
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.
|
|