facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search


Recent articles by author
I am mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it any more! (2014)
You may say I'm a pragmatist, but I'm not the only one (2013)
2011 BanglaCricket A to Z fka Alphabet soup (2012)
Return of the Armchair All-Rounder: Match Analysis, BD vs Aus ODI #2 (2011)
The case against the second spinner (2005)

Send Feedback | Email Article | Print Article | Font: | Size:

BanglaCricket Article

Armchair Allrounder Razab casts his eyes upon the clamor for Enamul&39;s inclusion into the Lord&39;s playing 11 and decides, "meh!" As usual statistics and subjective arguments are his weapons of choice.

The case against the second spinner

Published: 13th May, 2005


The Bangladesh team, on their maiden tour of England, has just come off a creditable performance in their opening match, a relaxed 3-day affair against the British Universities 11. Buoyed by the first avoidance of calamity, thoughts naturally turn to team selection for the 1st Test match at Lord's. An on-going debate has centered around whether the BD 11 should comprise 3 pacers and 1 spinner - as is wont in most non-subcontinental Test matches - or should the side sacrifice the 3rd seamer for our latest match-winner, Enamul Haque Jr.

Supporters of the two spinner theory have essentially put forward two major arguments:

  1. Regardless of conditions, BD should go into a match with its 4 best bowlers (with the implicit conclusion that based on current form, Enamul belongs in that list along with Rafique)
  2. England are weak against spin and are therefore likely to be more susceptible to the 2nd spinner than to the 3rd seamer.

To do justice to this argument, let us first analyze the conditions factor. The table below shows bowlers who have taken 5 or more wickets at Lord's in the last 20 years (since 1985).


Of the top 38 only 3 are spinners. Two of the three played for England and the best performance does not rank higher than 19th. Also note when those three 5-fers by spinners have occurred: in late English summer. By late summer, a number of matches have been played, the weather is warmer and so the pitches are generally drier and a little worse for wear; thus spinners get some purchase off the pitch. Even so, such luminaries as Muralitharan, Warne and Kumble do NOT even feature here. A spinners paradise, Lords is not.

In fact, England in general is not kind to spinners; hence that nation's paucity of quality ones. The pitches are soft and the outfields are lush. The ball rarely gets purchase off the pitch and is not overly roughed up by the outfield. the outfield. Perhaps it is worth it to look at some slow bowling numbers? Owing to England history with the the game, some form of filtering is in order. Since our two primary spinners are SLAs, for the sake of argument let us just focus on them. Furthermore, let us filter it to a few representative bowlers: people from the subcontinent or bowlers who rely mostly on loop or bowlers who depend on change of pace. The table belows shows a sampling of such SLA performances in Test matches in England.


Again, this is not a flattering chart. It shows that the number 1 task the SLAs have performed is to keep runs in check, with the average Economy rates mostly under 3 rpo. Wicket wise, even the great Bishan Bedi only managed 3.68 wickets per match. Giles is next with 3.01 wickets per match - and he has oodles of experience with the conditions.

So ... going by conditions and past history, one spinner is plenty for Lord's and pretty much for most English grounds. If that spinner is an SLA, he must be very accurate with any wickets coming as a bonus.

Going by the top 4 bowler argument, at this point, most would unequivocally pencil in Mashrafee Mortaza, Md. Rafique and Shahadat Hossain into the 11 for Lords. The decision is then who from Tapash Baisya, Talha Jubair, Anwar Hossain and Enamul Haque makes the cut? If one looks at the stats of each they really do not tell much. For example, look at the performance of our two SLAs in England in the past.

Granted ODIs are not the same as first class matches, but is there anything from these numbers that suggest either should play? Of course most know better. Rafique, with his relentless accuracy, hunger for bowling, deep wells of patience and, most important, proven track record outside Bangladesh and over a longer period of time, is a shoo-in. Funny, the same can almost be said about Tapash Baisya (once he sorts out his no-ball issue). This thread on the BanglaCricket forum discusses Tapash in more detail.

Recent Articles by the Author
The last batting spot for the England tour
Miscellaneous thoughts from an arm-chair all-rounder

Going by England's perceived weakness against spin, the 2nd chart seems to actually suggest otherwise. Most of those visiting spinners - you will notice - ended up on the losing side. It is true that England has traditionally struggled in the subcontinent against quality spinners, but then again which team doesn't? Even the mighty Aussies of present or the dominant Windies teams of yore fell prey to Harbhajan, Hirwani et al. England's weakness (in England) is actually against wrist spin, more precisely those dispensed by a certain Warne. (Do also witness the success of Mushtaq Ahmed and Upul Chandana at the county level). Even Daniel Vettori, the man whose bowling style Enamul resembles in terms of use of flight, loop, angles, etc. has not done much against the English team in their own backyard.

Conclusion? 3 Pacers and 1 Rafique it is!


About the author(s): Razab Q. Chowdhury feels particularly adept at being an armchair critic based on his past history of playing school cricket and dispatching a slew of West Indian cricketers while at college. He deigns to grace our forum as RazabQ and is a forum moderator.


This page has been viewed 8251 times.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket