What happen to Taposh Baysa??? - Page 2

cricman · #26 December 27, 2012, 02:41 AM

2/25 in 10 overs so far and that's with 7nb

Shaan · #27 December 27, 2012, 10:14 AM

some people here seems even havn't seen in their life how does Taposh used to bowl or how does he look and even making odd weird comments. By the way Taposh is much underrated then what he is. He has the capability of both way swing, he is handy batsman as well at the tail end. He has been doing very well recently in domestics but only GOd knows why he has been ignored, not getting any attention from big boys!!

Shehwar · #28 December 27, 2012, 12:57 PM

I have fond memories of Taposh! Specially that '04 series against The West Indians in the Caribbean! That was a Lion hearted performance!

Habib · #29 December 27, 2012, 03:14 PM

Taposh>Abul.

nadim 98 · #30 December 27, 2012, 03:34 PM

If he had Razzak and Shakib in his days, his careers stats would have been soo much better.

I used to like him as he was the guy who always gave us the first breakthrough of the match.

He is still young, and have a chance to come back

RezaA · #31 December 27, 2012, 03:54 PM

I still remember the win against Australia. Bangladesh won by 5 wickets. Same number of wickets was lost on Australian side. From that 5 wickets, Taposh took 3 wickets. Now you tell me. Taposh got 3 wickets from a side which was at its pick. Remember!!!

Rifat · #32 December 27, 2012, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nadim 98
If he had Razzak and Shakib in his days, his careers stats would have been soo much better.

I used to like him as he was the guy who always gave us the first breakthrough of the match.

He is still young, and have a chance to come back

He is 30 according to cricinfo.

nadim 98 · #33 December 27, 2012, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rifat
He is 30 according to cricinfo.

are ami to western standard e bolchilam

bangladeshi standard'e o to ekta buira murog

Equinox · #34 December 27, 2012, 04:52 PM

Can he possibly do any worse than Shahadat, Rubel or Abul? Why don't we pick someone with decent FC stats for once?

MyRoom · #35 December 27, 2012, 05:31 PM

I think we should give him one more chance for the next test series but when are the dates for the tour to Sri Lanka? gaps between International Cricket for Bangladesh is long and bad.

dark mage · #36 December 28, 2012, 12:08 PM

I liked him. Whenever Mashrafee was injured he would be the one to lead the attack. He had variation, pace and a big heart. In my opinion he was and is always better than Shahadat.

Roey Haque · #37 December 28, 2012, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Roey Haque
I miss Taposh. We are not the best in pace bowling, but I do fancy the quartet of Taposh, Mashrafe, Rube and Shafiul. I also liked Monjurul Islam. I think these are all fine pace bowlers who could benefit from better coaching and more practice on their part.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matribhasha
Please take your stand up comedy somewhere else.

Which part of my post did you find funny? That I expressed my liking for players like Taposh,Masharafe, Rubel and Shafiul? Or that they could learn and practice more to improve themselves?

Seriously, I don't see any humor in any of those two points. Boring generalizations maybe, but not funny.

Tiger444 · #38 December 28, 2012, 12:30 PM

Hows his and Talha's bowling nowadays? No don't bring up stats I want to know if he and Talha's bowling have been a result of good bowling. Remember these FC competitions and international cricket are a far different beast. That being said, if not the national team, him along with Talha can be given chances in the A team. They should definitely be kept on the radar if they're actually bowling well. We should be having about 8-10 pacers in our pipeline and keeping them fresh. We can't just rely on 3-4 pacers in the long run.

Crisis · #39 December 29, 2012, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Humayun
I still remember the win against Australia. Bangladesh won by 5 wickets. Same number of wickets was lost on Australian side. From that 5 wickets, Taposh took 3 wickets. Now you tell me. Taposh got 3 wickets from a side which was at its pick. Remember!!!

Yes, I do remember that match. We won that match all thanks to him!
Here's highlights of that match :

http://youtu.be/ZsrtB-PZw2w

Mash, Nazmul and Tapash were in that match!

firstlane · #40 December 29, 2012, 11:28 PM

I liked watching him bowling during our '03-'04 test series against Australia. He didn't get many wickets but troubled few Australian batsmen.

Fazal · #41 January 9, 2013, 12:06 AM

... and I like his slogging... Mashrafee ki....taar theke dui goon bashi.

Habib · #42 January 9, 2013, 03:27 AM

Taposh should be included in the A team along with Abul in order to decide who is better.

One World · #43 January 10, 2013, 07:04 PM

BTW, his fielding is horrible.

Gowza · #44 January 10, 2013, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiger444
Hows his and Talha's bowling nowadays? No don't bring up stats I want to know if he and Talha's bowling have been a result of good bowling. Remember these FC competitions and international cricket are a far different beast. That being said, if not the national team, him along with Talha can be given chances in the A team. They should definitely be kept on the radar if they're actually bowling well. We should be having about 8-10 pacers in our pipeline and keeping them fresh. We can't just rely on 3-4 pacers in the long run.

yes if australia is anything to go by any national team needs 8-10 pacers within it's rotation. australia atm are so lucky they have so many great fast bowlers, i think any other team would be truly struggling if they had to combat so many pacer injuries (some are struggling without injuries to their main guys).

Rubu · #45 January 10, 2013, 08:14 PM

Keep in mind, Taposh is a decent tail end batsman as well and have saved our back a few times in international matches as well. I would not mind evaluating him more at all.

al Furqaan · #46 January 10, 2013, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Habib
Taposh should be included in the A team along with Abul in order to decide who is better.

Whats with all the Abul love? All he has is a bit of pace, has even taken a single wicket in BCL. He might be able to swing the ball a touch, and even then he doesn't look like troubling anyone. I think Sajidul and Tapash and even Shafiul are much better pacers.

Murad · #47 January 10, 2013, 11:09 PM

Taposh is still 10 times better than Shahadat and Rubel.

100 times better than Abul.

One World · #48 January 11, 2013, 01:02 AM

Well Abul has lot of time to ripe, he can take another 4 domestic seasons before returning.
He will still be young for our team.
Not same for Taposh. Actually, this comparison itself is pointless.

We saw heroic returns in Agarkar, Nehra, Best, Bond. We can expect a similar from Taposh, limited to his own level indeed.

shakibrulz · #49 January 11, 2013, 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Whats with all the Abul love? All he has is a bit of pace, has even taken a single wicket in BCL. He might be able to swing the ball a touch, and even then he doesn't look like troubling anyone. I think Sajidul and Tapash and even Shafiul are much better pacers.

This. The guy's going at like 5 RPO wiithout a bloody wicket. That's awful. If he comes back or something, great. But now he's absolute rubbish.

Hell even Reza or Zia is doing WAY better than Abul now.