Nasmus Sadat scored 48 without facing a single ball!

LateCut · #1 January 23, 2006, 01:39 PM

Nasmus Sadat scored 48 without facing a single ball!

I wish I was there!

Belim had a decent strike rate but not infinity.

Source:

http://www.tigercricket.com/Scorecard.aspx?matchid=330

Fazal · #2 January 23, 2006, 01:41 PM

I think he scored all his runs in no balls.

Tigers_eye · #3 January 23, 2006, 01:56 PM

72 balls atleast. 300 total balls minus 228 (added the rest of the balls faced by the other batsmen). There were 13 wides but should not be counted in 300 balls.

sadi · #4 January 23, 2006, 01:58 PM

this time he scored 104 from 137... okay strike rate considering the last time he had a infinity strike rate...

Tigers_eye · #5 January 23, 2006, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fazal
I think he scored all his runs in no balls.

Facing all no-balls how can he be bowled? lol. Having an infinite strike-rate should automatically promote him into the national squad, heck world squad.

rudro · #6 January 23, 2006, 02:01 PM

He scored those runs off the "hairy ball" on the shoulder of tigercricket.com's web-adminstrator.

LateCut · #7 January 23, 2006, 05:28 PM

They are still running the garbage scorecard.
I guess they are sleeping.

mshakir56 · #8 January 23, 2006, 07:51 PM

how is that possible?

cricman · #9 January 23, 2006, 07:53 PM

the person in charge for putting data in the database screwed up thats all.

Hatebreed · #10 January 24, 2006, 01:47 AM

:embaressed:

guy_zin · #11 January 24, 2006, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rudro
He scored those runs off the "hairy ball" on the shoulder of tigercricket.com's web-adminstrator.

we used to call that "Bichi Kandhe" on those goldie oldie days..

Cricket Crazy · #12 January 24, 2006, 08:05 AM

tHIS REMINDS OF MY OWN TEAM PLAYER WHO GAVE MORE THAN 30 NO-BALLS IN AN OVER.

LateCut · #13 January 24, 2006, 12:49 PM

This post was meant to ba a joke. Evidently, somebody at TigerCricket slipped up. This happens. But I am surprised that they have not corrected it yet. If I were TigerCricket operartive I would regularly check BanglaCricket to so was being said about them. I am surprised they have not cought on to this yet.

LateCut · #14 January 24, 2006, 12:49 PM

This post was meant to ba a joke. Evidently, somebody at TigerCricket slipped up. This happens. But I am surprised that they have not corrected it yet. If I were TigerCricket operartive I would regularly check BanglaCricket to so was being said about them. I am surprised they have not cought on to this yet.

Fazal · #15 January 24, 2006, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LateCut
This post was meant to ba a joke.

Oh Ha Ha

Quote:

Originally posted by LateCut
This post was meant to ba a joke.

Ha Ha Ha...

but why two identical message? Does that signify something also?

Tigers_eye · #16 January 24, 2006, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LateCut
This post was meant to ba a joke. Evidently, somebody at TigerCricket slipped up. This happens. But I am surprised that they have not corrected it yet. If I were TigerCricket operartive I would regularly check BanglaCricket to so was being said about them. I am surprised they have not cought on to this yet.

I am copying another post of mine in just so that anyone from tigerCricket.com stumble into this thread.

"There are some problems in Tigercricket reportings. It says for the supersix match Sonargaon vs Old DOHS "Result : Sonargaon Cricketers Won By 7 Wickets" However Sonargaon batted first and won by 7 runs. Either these folks at tigercricket.com have no idea of cricket or they are not paid enough. There are several mistakes that are popping up on this site. Like the infinite striking rate of Nazmus Sadat 1 where he faced 72 balls. Or BD Academy's Nabil Samad picking up three wickets but getting credit for 2 wickets against UAE. Silly mistakes, database input issue whatever it may be, this is a national website for our cricket board and mistakes like this should not be happening. "

TheWatcher · #17 January 24, 2006, 04:18 PM

The list goes on- writting Kaqibul instead of Raqibul, confusing Kazi Kamrul Islam the U/19 left arm pacer with over 20 Kamrul Islam Emon the right hand bat and part time offie

Scorecard

Btw, it is Nazmus, not Nasmus.

[Edited on 24-1-2006 by TheWatcher]

rudro · #18 January 24, 2006, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheWatcher
The list goes on- writting Kaqibul instead of Raqibul, confusing Kazi Kamrul Islam the U/19 left arm pacer with over 20 Kamrul Islam Emon the right hand bat and part time offie

Btw, it is Nazmus, not Nasmus.

[Edited on 24-1-2006 by TheWatcher]

Well, at least they did not write Kazi Nazrul Islam instead of "Kazi Kamrul Islam".....lol