facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 12, 2016, 05:59 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093
Default Kusal Perera Cleared Of Doping Charges: ICC Expresses Regret

Well done ICC. Keep it up. Full credit to Kusal Perera's legal team to have the courage to lock horns with these corrupt, biased buffoons who call themselves the International Cricket Council. Not sure whose welfare they are promoting.

Bit of a lesson for BCB also. They could have challenged ICC legally on Taskin on the grounds of rules/constitution. Sometimes you just got to stick it to the man.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/srilanka...y/1012617.html
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old May 12, 2016, 07:48 AM
Tigers_eye's Avatar
Tigers_eye Tigers_eye is offline
Cricket Savant
 
Join Date: June 30, 2005
Location: Little Rock
Favorite Player: Viv Richards, Steve Waugh
Posts: 32,798

What a black eye on ICC doping team.

He was a crucial part for all three formats and missed the Asia Cup and WC. I feel for him.
__________________
The Weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is an attribute of the Strong." - Gandhi.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 12, 2016, 07:57 AM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 2,810

ICC should be b****slapped.
To all those who were arguing for ICC on the case for Taskin, here is your proof too
__________________
Taskin Ahmed Tazim : 143 KPH - 18 years - Against Aussies - 1st April, 2014
148 KPH - 20 years - Against Pak At Dhaka - 2nd March 2016
150 KPH - Coming Soon.. Will be the first Bangladeshi
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 12, 2016, 03:13 PM
horizon horizon is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: January 29, 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,851

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanvir_nus
ICC should be b****slapped.
To all those who were arguing for ICC on the case for Taskin, here is your proof too
ICC should be cautious and Taskin could be the next mistake.
__________________
The best tennis ball cricketer ever ... is ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 12, 2016, 05:42 PM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanvir_nus
ICC should be b****slapped.
To all those who were arguing for ICC on the case for Taskin, here is your proof too
Proof of what? One was carried out in an ICC run testing centre the other was in an independently run doping centre in Qatar that has nothing to do with the ICC. There's no similarity at all.

Should probably have a basic knowledge of what you're talking about before you spout your conspiracy theories.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 12, 2016, 07:26 PM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 2,810

In both cases they were WRONG.
__________________
Taskin Ahmed Tazim : 143 KPH - 18 years - Against Aussies - 1st April, 2014
148 KPH - 20 years - Against Pak At Dhaka - 2nd March 2016
150 KPH - Coming Soon.. Will be the first Bangladeshi
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 12, 2016, 07:51 PM
mij mij is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,610

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickets
Proof of what? One was carried out in an ICC run testing centre the other was in an independently run doping centre in Qatar that has nothing to do with the ICC. There's no similarity at all.

Should probably have a basic knowledge of what you're talking about before you spout your conspiracy theories.
And who are you looks like you know it all.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 13, 2016, 01:12 AM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanvir_nus
In both cases they were WRONG.
No they weren't, in one case an independent drug testing centre was wrong and in the other you're playing the victim card and putting out blind conspiracies alongside it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 13, 2016, 01:13 AM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by mij
And who are you looks like you know it all.
I'm just some randomer on a forum who is capable of reading basic facts provided in articles.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 13, 2016, 01:43 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

Clearly process was breached in finding Taskin's action faulty. Come on dont be so naive. They should put Bumrah or Ashwin under the circumstances in which Taskin was. But they wont, thats why always conspiracy. On what basis did that umpire suspect him, when the so called deliveries werent bowled in that match. Conspiracies will arise if you do things in doubtful ways.

Only mistake from our end was BCB's unwillingness to challenge ICC, which Kusal Perera has done. But hopefully Kusal's experience will provide courage to others to step up in future.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old May 13, 2016, 02:03 AM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesh
Clearly process was breached in finding Taskin's action faulty. Come on dont be so naive. They should put Bumrah or Ashwin under the circumstances in which Taskin was. But they wont, thats why always conspiracy. On what basis did that umpire suspect him, when the so called deliveries werent bowled in that match. Conspiracies will arise if you do things in doubtful ways.

Only mistake from our end was BCB's unwillingness to challenge ICC, which Kusal Perera has done. But hopefully Kusal's experience will provide courage to others to step up in future.
Not gonna go through this all over again as there's a different thread for it but the umpires didn't have to have a reason for suspecting him rather than having any small feeling that he may possibly be chucking. Just because it was found that he didn't bowl a ball that he was found to chuck in that match doesn't mean he should be allowed to continue until he chucks again s couple of matches on and then be banned.

And where on earth was the process breached? There's no evidence that is was anything but followed to the letter.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old May 13, 2016, 03:08 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickets
Not gonna go through this all over again as there's a different thread for it but the umpires didn't have to have a reason for suspecting him rather than having any small feeling that he may possibly be chucking. Just because it was found that he didn't bowl a ball that he was found to chuck in that match doesn't mean he should be allowed to continue until he chucks again s couple of matches on and then be banned.

And where on earth was the process breached? There's no evidence that is was anything but followed to the letter.
Are you kidding me.

This is the issue, you guys like to read articles/news with your mind already made up and hence you miss the details that matter. Check what your own country's media has reported.

http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/g...eds-suspension

Sorry but if you have to suspect people on "small feelings", Ashwin and Bumrah will give you reasons every game.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old May 13, 2016, 03:50 AM
tanvir_nus's Avatar
tanvir_nus tanvir_nus is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: April 17, 2005
Location: the heart of the tiger
Favorite Player: Taskin Ahmed - TazKing
Posts: 2,810

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickets
No they weren't, in one case an independent drug testing centre was wrong and in the other you're playing the victim card and putting out blind conspiracies alongside it.
Not playing any victims card here, and there was no conspiracy theories behind a lot of the biasedness and judgmental issues with ICC, it is out there for everyone to see. I can list a thousand "mishaps", erroneous decisions, facepalm moments for you, but since you claim to have some intelligence to decode articles, please read aloud again. The fact is there is no consistency in some of the decisions they are making, there is a clear favoritism on display for monetary or whatever reasons. Could go on and on, but lets remind ourselves, ICC can never go wrong. Yet they did. Over and over again
__________________
Taskin Ahmed Tazim : 143 KPH - 18 years - Against Aussies - 1st April, 2014
148 KPH - 20 years - Against Pak At Dhaka - 2nd March 2016
150 KPH - Coming Soon.. Will be the first Bangladeshi
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old May 13, 2016, 05:37 AM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesh
Are you kidding me.

This is the issue, you guys like to read articles/news with your mind already made up and hence you miss the details that matter. Check what your own country's media has reported.

http://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/g...eds-suspension

Sorry but if you have to suspect people on "small feelings", Ashwin and Bumrah will give you reasons every game.
I'm not Indian so I don't know why you assume I am, presumably because I'm rubbishing your conspiracy theories.

For the record the source of the above article was the Bangladeshi lawyer, who was so official he posted his statement on Facebook. A statement which consisted of multiple false claims over the icc regulations and showed he didn't understand or was intentionally ignoring icc regulations easily available on their website.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old May 13, 2016, 05:53 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

You re surely talking like one. Because even with regards to both Taskin and Kusal Perera, only ppl i saw defending ICC are from India. Even now as we speak they ridicule Kusals talent.

I d take the lawyers word over yours and those terms are there in the website . And who can blame him for opening a can of worms your cricket board has cooked up.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old May 13, 2016, 05:54 AM
Monish's Avatar
Monish Monish is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 23, 2016
Posts: 72

Good for him
__________________
ATTITUDE - I AM ALL ABOUT IT
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old May 13, 2016, 06:02 AM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeesh
You re surely talking like one. Because even with regards to both Taskin and Kusal Perera, only ppl i saw defending ICC are from India. Even now as we speak they ridicule Kusals talent.

I d take the lawyers word over yours and those terms are there in the website . And who can blame him for opening a can of worms your cricket board has cooked up.
Feel free to believe I'm from wherever you want to believe I'm from simply because I don't believe in your conspriacy theories as it doesn't make a difference to me.

And again if you want to believe the lawyer whose statement contains information that can be found to be clearly false by simply reading through the easily accesible testing procedure document on the icc website over me then feel free to.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old May 13, 2016, 06:05 AM
Monish's Avatar
Monish Monish is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 23, 2016
Posts: 72

As per some people blame all on India is the go thing, if tom the Sun sets in the east they shall blame India. roflll
__________________
ATTITUDE - I AM ALL ABOUT IT
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old May 13, 2016, 06:06 AM
mij mij is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,610

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickets
I'm just some randomer on a forum who is capable of reading basic facts provided in articles.
Stop talking random stuff here.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old May 13, 2016, 06:11 AM
Wickets Wickets is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 19, 2016
Posts: 124

Quote:
Originally Posted by mij
Stop talking random stuff here.
Think you'll find other people are the ones talking random stuff with absoloutely no basis and I'm the one stating facts.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old May 14, 2016, 02:37 AM
godzilla's Avatar
godzilla godzilla is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: March 4, 2009
Posts: 5,009

I don't understand why everyone is just bashing wicket here. Putting Taskin's issue aside, he does bring up a valid point. If the Qatar lab made a mistake and presented the RESULTS to ICC, ICC reacted towards the results with their protocols. You guys can argue about why ICC decided to go ahead with an independent lab rather than their own then you would have an argument. You guys are bashing this guy just for the sake of bashin ... He made a simple and a correct FACT!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old May 14, 2016, 04:18 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

When you are the crickets elite governing body it is reasonable to expect you to use diligence before making any deliberation on any case. Whether the test was done in Chennai or Qatar or wherever they should have been 100% sure. In December 6th, ICC reported Kusal, and by mid December itself Sri Lanka pathologist who was consulted saw sth fishy. Given so many doping cases in sports around the world, surely ICC should have one specialist who could interpret these results and question.

The guy endured so much of trauma the last 6 months, integrity and character questioned did a lie detector test, hair test. Missed out on Asia Cup, T20WC. Sri Lankan board itself had to cough up close to 100,000 USD to investigate this. Thats only on the books, imagine the indirect costs.

Ppl are not agreeing with wickets because he doesnt see the fault in ICC's part in this case, or even Taskins.

I wonder whether ICC would be willing to pull the trigger on an Indian player like this if the situation arose.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old May 14, 2016, 04:33 AM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

Have a look at this written by Wisdens Managing Editor who takes a swipe at ICC

http://lk.wisdenasia.com/cricket-blo...justice/210327
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old May 14, 2016, 08:57 PM
horizon horizon is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: January 29, 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,851

Just a FYI, almost all sports authorities struggle with dope testing - from OIC to FIFA. As someone has already pointed out, ICC needs to be careful about these. ICC is already an inefficient corrupt organization, you can't expect better from them. Keep chucking aside, now Bangladesh Cricket team and management is working on Taskin and Sunny's action. They'll come back soon.
__________________
The best tennis ball cricketer ever ... is ...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old May 14, 2016, 10:36 PM
Kingslayer Kingslayer is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 13, 2015
Posts: 193

Quote:
Originally Posted by mij
Stop talking random stuff here.
Don't be rude come on. I see nothing wrong. He is just posting his opinion. Are we that childish that we tell everyone who doesn't share same opinion to shut up?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket