facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:32 PM
Spitfire_x86's Avatar
Spitfire_x86 Spitfire_x86 is offline
Cricket Legend
Fantasy Winner: BD v NZ 2008
 
Join Date: December 17, 2004
Posts: 7,713

Quote:
Originally posted by AsifTheManRahman
why rajjak? what has he done other than getting blasted in the last match that he played?
we've too much good players in stock and everybody's performing very consistently. so we may try using australian player rotation policiy
Reply With Quote

  #52  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:35 PM
fwullah's Avatar
fwullah fwullah is offline
First BC Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: A successful cricketer
Posts: 6,545

I just had a sneak-peek at the IND match that we won - we had the following bowling line up:

1. Tapash
2. Mashrafee
3. Nazmul
4. Mahmud
5. Rafique


Why can't we have the same bowling combination against Zimbabwe? I know that Rafique is out through injury, so why didn't we let Enamul Junior just take the position of Rafique and then leave the rest of the guys same as before?

Why can't Tapash, Mashrafee, Nazmul and Mahmud play in the same team? Aren't we relying too much on spin from the very first game in this ODI series?

Rajjak is a good spin bowler, but as it was evident from the very first game that if a specialist bowler is not himself, then this Zimbabwe side will smash that bowler no matter how good a (spin) bowler he is.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:38 PM
AsifTheManRahman's Avatar
AsifTheManRahman AsifTheManRahman is offline
Super Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678

Quote:
Originally posted by fwullah
I just had a sneak-peek at the IND match that we won - we had the following bowling line up:

1. Tapash
2. Mashrafee
3. Nazmul
4. Mahmud
5. Rafique


Why can't we have the same bowling combination against Zimbabwe? I know that Rafique is out through injury, so why didn't we let Enamul Junior just take the position of Rafique and then leave the rest of the guys same as before?

Why can't Tapash, Mashrafee, Nazmul and Mahmud play in the same team? Aren't we relying too much on spin from the very first game in this ODI series?

Rajjak is a good spin bowler, but as it was evident from the very first game that if a specialist bowler is not himself, then this Zimbabwe side will smash that bowler no matter how good a (spin) bowler he is.
answer: over confidence leading to complacency
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:48 PM
aftitabi aftitabi is offline
Street Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 16, 2005
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 24

Frankly speaking, Rana didn't do too bad/
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:50 PM
AsifTheManRahman's Avatar
AsifTheManRahman AsifTheManRahman is offline
Super Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678

i dont know why they are replacing rana with rajjak either
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:51 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: September 6, 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,300

I think we are focusing to the wrong point.
If someone thinks that the only reason for defeat in the 2nd ODI are the bowlers, then I will not agree. It's true that they have conceded 90 runs in the last 10 overs, but still the bowlers restricted Zim total less than first ODI. The miserable failure was the middle order. We were short of batsman. Now with the new changes if Enam Jr., Nazmul and Razzak will play in the playing XI then we will be more short of batsman then the last ODI.
Razzak's bowling was proved as toothless and ineffective against Zim in the very first match, can he prove it otherwise?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:55 PM
AsifTheManRahman's Avatar
AsifTheManRahman AsifTheManRahman is offline
Super Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678

Quote:
Originally posted by Sam
I think we are focusing to the wrong point.
If someone thinks that the only reason for defeat in the 2nd ODI are the bowlers, then I will not agree. It's true that they have conceded 90 runs in the last 10 overs, but still the bowlers restricted Zim total less than first ODI. The miserable failure was the middle order. We were short of batsman. Now with the new changes if Enam Jr., Nazmul and Razzak will play in the playing XI then we will be more short of batsman then the last ODI.
Razzak's bowling was proved as toothless and ineffective against Zim in the very first match, can he prove it otherwise?
thats exactly why i want rana in the team instead of rajjak.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old January 25, 2005, 12:59 PM
sadi's Avatar
sadi sadi is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 3, 2005
Location: In my room
Favorite Player: Mushi
Posts: 6,709

i am so mad at the selectors. They keep making mistakes. I rather see three fast bowlers than the spinners like rana or razzak who is not effective at all. Taking out tapash is only gona make our batting weaker cuz i dun think nazmul is a better bowler than tapash. So i would rather play nazmul in place of rana. so my side is nafis, razin, aftab, sumon, ash, pilot, sujon, masrafee, tapash, nazmul and enamul.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old January 25, 2005, 01:26 PM
Cricket46 Cricket46 is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 8, 2003
Posts: 596

As far as I am concerned, there are too many inexperienced players in the proposed playing XI - Nafis, Aftab, Nazmul, Enamul, and Razzak. Can they handle a pressure match like this one? Sumon has said this is a do-or die match? Aftab, Nazmul and Razzak are not in the best of forms. I hope this team proves me wrong.

Except Sumon, Nafis and Pilot all the others can bowl - atleast as a part time bowler. But what about the batting? We were complaining about a batsman short in the previous team. That problem still persists.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old January 25, 2005, 01:43 PM
Faisal Faisal is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: March 4, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 1,485

guys dont worry..... masrafee palying.... tapos getting drop and nazmul wil play insted of tapos...

so masrafee & nazmul palying
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old January 25, 2005, 01:48 PM
Ehsan's Avatar
Ehsan Ehsan is offline
BanglaCricket Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,279

I would put Tapash ahead of Nazmul as Tapash can bat a bit and if required can slog as well, Nazmul can do none.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old January 25, 2005, 01:55 PM
mahbubH's Avatar
mahbubH mahbubH is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Giggs, Gower, and Wasim!
Posts: 4,729

Good Aftab is in ... hope he will shine this time. Taposh is always a better choice than Nazmul who knows may be he is not fit. Razzak is better bowler than Rana . This team is weaker in batting (on paper) than 2nd ODI teram ....
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old January 25, 2005, 01:58 PM
akabir77's Avatar
akabir77 akabir77 is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: February 23, 2004
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Favorite Player: Nantu Ghotok
Posts: 10,882

I know why taposh is out and razak is in...
you see probably there is some local MP trying to take his GORU so he left the team to protect them and RAzaak was told to bowl with his bend hand so he get band but more imp get 10 wkts

source :nowhere
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old January 25, 2005, 02:19 PM
Bat-PadTogether Bat-PadTogether is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 30, 2004
Posts: 623

Changes will not help guys.We are going to loose the series 5-0.Zims are far better side in ODI.Where is Mr.Pull(Bashar) who with his big mouth told the media that his team will win the ODI series 5-0.Just Big mouth.........Sack Bashar as captain so he can concentrate on his batting.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old January 25, 2005, 04:01 PM
reyme's Avatar
reyme reyme is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Favorite Player: Umpires!
Posts: 4,228

ONE change might help. Niaz Morshed/Ziaur Rahman/Rifat Bin Sattar as CAPTAIN but will play as a 12/13th man in the team.

Someone who can play chess game. This way he will have a plan, handle mental pressure and adjust as game demands. Just convey the game plan to the "acting" captain in the filed. "Muchosta bidda" is in our blood, if the question is not common in the exam we tend to get nervous and do poorly in the exam. Isn't that right???

This might sound like a joke, but thats how the football is played in NFL. Really lot of time it is easy to plan for the game when you are just watching. My hope is Dav Whatmore should assume this position, to be more practical. But apparently since he is also watching with the rest of us, I would make Niaz Morshed as the thinktank CAPTAIN.

Edited on, January 25, 2005, 9:03 PM GMT, by reyme.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old January 25, 2005, 04:14 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718



Picture Left: Captan Bashar checking the pitch before deciding to bowl first, or to bat first or to pass both and go home.

Picture Right: New surprise in BD bowling lineup to address slog overs. Bowls much faster than ChaCha.

Edited on, January 25, 2005, 9:57 PM GMT, by Fazal.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old January 25, 2005, 06:07 PM
sham1980 sham1980 is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 6, 2005
Location: London
Posts: 377

the only good thing is at least we know how bad we are
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old January 25, 2005, 06:11 PM
sham1980 sham1980 is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 6, 2005
Location: London
Posts: 377

i know lets bring back hasibul hussain that will solve our problems
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old January 26, 2005, 06:47 AM
Pagla_Baba's Avatar
Pagla_Baba Pagla_Baba is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 228

Quote:
Originally posted by ZaKi
another defeat... this time 40 runs....Coz 1st ODI was 22... 2nd was 31.. so 3rd will be 40
true but the result is opposite. We just won.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old January 26, 2005, 06:48 AM
Pagla_Baba's Avatar
Pagla_Baba Pagla_Baba is offline
First Class Cricketer
 
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 228

man i miss raf
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket