Nasir instead of Miraz in the ODI team

[sakib12]

I think Nasir deserves to be ahead of Miraz in the ODI team as he is an established player much better batsman with a good strike rate....probably a better fielder although that is debatable.....they are probably on the same level as an ODI bowler as Nasir is quite effective and has taken some crucial wickets....do you guys agree?

[Gowza]

Have them both, drop riyad. Both are better bowlers than riyad atm, nasir a better bat, both are younger. Miraz is a bowling all rounder, nasir the batting allrounder.

[sakib12]

Originally Posted by Gowza
Have them both, drop riyad.

Yeah thats an option but selectors are quite loyal to Riyad despite his poor form.

[sakib12]

The other thing to mention here is that Nasirs a great finisher something we will need against strong opposition.

[NoName]

Originally Posted by sakib12
Yeah thats an option but selectors are quite loyal to Riyad despite his poor form.

Because Captain threatens to not play

[DinRaat.]

Nasir is loads better than Miraz, just one good debut, and fans a going ga ga over him, Ive seen this so many times, typical B.D Fanistitis, a few good matches, we claim players to be better than they really are.

[Jadukor]

Nasir has had his chance so let Miraz have his. We can have both in the team if Ryad continues to flop

[Gowza]

Originally Posted by NoName
Because Captain threatens to not play

Then let the captain not play, mash has done a lot for BD cricket but to play riyad just so mash plays is ridiculous, team will be fine without mash and is at current better off without riyad.

[Eclipse]

Originally Posted by NoName
Because Captain threatens to not play

Did u expect anything else from mash? He's now Blackmailing the selectors. Pathetic.

[Rana Melb]

Nasir is not a good batsman outside SC.He ll struggle in seaming conditions.

[aklemalp]

Originally Posted by Rana Melb
Nasir is not a good batsman outside SC.He ll struggle in seaming conditions.

Every BD batsmen will struggle outside subcontinent.

It is known.

[Gowza]

Nasir has barely played outside sc other than Zimbabwe where he averages over 45 from 7 matches in ODIs, in t20Is again he's barely played outside sc but his best is in ireland, similar in tests he's barely played outside sc and the times he has is usually against weak opposition so there isn't much to go in when it comes to his capability outside of the sc.

[ReZ_1]

I am happy with the current team

[al Furqaan]

Nasir over Imrul or Sanjamul.

[Shaan]

if Naisr has to make into team it has to be Mullah or Mosa's place i don't see any chance Nasir is getting selected in place of Miraz.
So far MIraz looks getting better and better with his alround performance which ever format he has played. Don't think selector will select Nasir in place of Miraz,

[simon]

High time we replace Ryad with Nasir.
Ryad has done nothing special in odis for a very long time now, Sri series should have been his last chance.
Ryad is a quality player so he should come back but for the time being Nasir should be brought back and I hope he gets a full series, not one match here and there.

I remember after 2nd odi vs Eng the english cricketer Nasser said don't drop Nasir Hossain.

Mosad, Sabbir and Miraz should not be bothered.

[Rana Melb]

Nasir played wc 15 in aus n nz.. and didn't do well with the bat.

[BD_TigerZ]

Sabbir is not a #3 so once he is down the order what is the need of riyad? get someone in who can bowl and be a match winner on the field in nasir.

[kalpurush]

Originally Posted by DinRaat.
Nasir is loads better than Miraz, just one good debut, and fans a going ga ga over him, Ive seen this so many times, typical B.D Fanistitis, a few good matches, we claim players to be better than they really are.

HA! Ha!! Gold fish memories!!!

Didn't Miraz took the honor of the best player at U-19 WC 2016?

[kalpurush]

Originally Posted by aklemalp
Every BD batsmen will struggle outside subcontinent.

It is known.

Really?

How about Mullah's two tons at WC 2015 and TI's tons in England? Even Pilot has a ton against WI, no?

[aklemalp]

Originally Posted by kalpurush
Really?

How about Mullah's two tons at WC 2015 and TI's tons in England? Even Pilot has a ton against WI, no?

Give me more names KP bhai.

[Match Adda]

Riad might be handy again in English condition. But I like to see him bats in no.6 .. every time he bats there , bd scored more runs and dependable for stopping collapse.... I like to drop Miraz for his poor batting, he's ok with test... but not in odi for now ...so this is my squad

Tamim
Sarkar
Sabbir
Musfiq
Sakib
Mosaddek
Riad
Nasir
Mashrafe
Mustafiz
Taskin

I believe this squad will be killing squad for champions trophy.
If Riad fails, we will go with Miraz. And after mash retired... saifuddin will fill up that gap.

[kalpurush]

Originally Posted by aklemalp
Give me more names KP bhai.

How many matches we have played outside Bangladesh in the last few years mate, except of course Zimbabwe?




Shakib scored a double ton again the Kiwis too!

[aklemalp]

Originally Posted by kalpurush
How many matches we have played outside Bangladesh in the last few years mate, except of course Zimbabwe?




Shakib scored a double ton again the Kiwis too!

I was being historical. I know of the quality of the new age BD team.

I was, however, going back to the beginning of time to now.

So, please understand the context from where I made that statement, I wanted info

Thank you

[kalpurush]

Originally Posted by Match Adda
Riad might be handy again in English condition. But I like to see him bats in no.6 .. every time he bats there , bd scored more runs and dependable for stopping collapse.... I like to drop Miraz for his poor batting, he's ok with test... but not in odi for now ...so this is my squad

Tamim
Sarkar
Sabbir
Musfiq
Sakib
Mosaddek
Riad
Nasir
Mashrafe
Mustafiz
Taskin

I believe this squad will be killing squad for champions trophy.
If Riad fails, we will go with Miraz. And after mash retired... saifuddin will fill up that gap.

I might go with RBX (Rubel) in place of Taskin ....it does looks an awesome squad indeed.