|
Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket
|
January 16, 2005, 11:23 PM
|
Administrator BanglaCricket Founder
|
|
Join Date: June 20, 2002
Location: Virginia, USA
Favorite Player: তামীম, শাï¿
Posts: 9,472
|
|
Zimbabwe is prolly better then Kenya, BD and Scotland.
India should rank higher
This cracked me up - "at least Bd has beaten a very understrenght indian" - it was missing maybe 3 of their front line players. If that makes the team a very understrenght team then India will really need to worry about their cricket. Now Zimbabwe is fielding a very US team, there is no doutb about that and that is why is pains me to see us in such bad position in the second test. Also, Zimbabwe proved that they can score quickly at will and that worries me no end. The ODI's will be much closer then what I had earlier anticipated. These players are no pushovers. They are positively pumped and ready for the BD challenge, however, they will still struggle against bigger teams.
|
January 17, 2005, 12:16 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 13, 2003
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 2,746
|
|
We will see if Zimabawe is better than Bangladesh in the forthcoming ODI series.... maybe they r... maybe they are not
|
January 17, 2005, 07:02 AM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: February 4, 2004
Location: Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Posts: 1,220
|
|
india have not played so many one-days in last 6/7 months. so i would prefer to rate their performance after the pakistan's india tour
|
January 17, 2005, 09:00 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 10, 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 235
|
|
India have played a lot of ODI criket in recent times, losing to Aus, NZ, bangaladesh, srilanka to name a few sides.
|
January 17, 2005, 09:01 AM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 10, 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 235
|
|
You guys rate india to highly, they are not a ODI team they are a good test team, look @ their recent ODI record.
|
January 19, 2005, 09:05 AM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 13, 2003
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 2,746
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by islam
Well scotland have beaten West Indies convinclingly and have thrashed canada and kenya. Canada and kenya have beaten Bangladesh (world cup), via that logic alone Scotland is better than bangladesh, complied with the fact that most of the scotish players play in the english county, which is a higher level of cricket that the bangladeshi national compitition.
|
ok missed this post b4... u r baseing ur ratings on ONE match per pair of teams? the two against Bangladesh TWO YEARS AGO!!!
|
January 19, 2005, 09:40 AM
|
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 52
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by islam
1. Australia: Awsome batting depth and decent bowling, couplied with great feilding.
2. New Zealand: No real great players, but each player tries 120% and never gives up. The only team which beats Aus on a regular basis.
3. England: England is the new team comming through, should have won the ICC thropy, decent bowling side and some clean hitters in the batting order.
4. Sri lanka : over rated, good @ home and agaisnt other sub continantal sides, but get thrashed agaisnt overseas teams and against better teams.
5. Pakistan: No real batting, good young bowlers and keep the side together with its allround capablity.
6. WI: A one man team. The lara show is good in batting held around by lara, but lacks in the bowling. Won the ICC throphy on an one off partnership. When Lara does the job, they win.
8. S.A: Their best feilded team would have them higer in the order, but as it is the are probably seventh or even eight. Good bowling, not much of anything else. No one performs.
7. Indian: A team of failious, they only perform in the world cups, and harldy win ODI's other than those in largish compititions, good batting who more often than not don't perfom.
9. Scotland: underated beat WI in a ODI match earlier this year, probably better than the WI, most players play in the english county comp, but not much international cricket (country is one level down).
10. bangladesh: decent side, but strugle against the new ball, not the talent of sides above them, but are marginaly better than the sides below them.
11. Kenya: Some good players, most retiring now, not getting enought cricket to improve.
12. ZIM: Will probably move up the list due to strong recent showings, a win againt bang will put them in good steed.
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its obvious that you hate India and live somewhere near Scotland! Nice try though.
Edited on, January 19, 2005, 2:41 PM GMT, by Canada_R.
|
January 19, 2005, 09:47 AM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
i believe that india should be ranked higher, and that zimbabwe is better than Bangladesh. I am not sure we will be able to win consistently against the likes of Canada and Scotland. As for Kenya, their current team is a bunch of crap.
|
January 19, 2005, 09:53 AM
|
|
Club Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 52
|
|
Who is the author of this site?
Is it Islam?
|
January 19, 2005, 10:00 AM
|
|
Super Moderator BC Editorial Team
|
|
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: Ice Man, Chatter Box
Posts: 27,678
|
|
"ratings calculated by computer program "
hehe...lots of bugs in that program
|
January 19, 2005, 10:21 AM
|
Street Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 17, 2005
Posts: 14
|
|
India at 7!!
Its true theyare facing some tough time.
But they are not as bad as for no. 7 spot.
|
January 19, 2005, 11:29 PM
|
|
Cricket Legend
|
|
Join Date: August 13, 2003
Location: Queensland Australia
Posts: 2,746
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AsifTheManRahman
"ratings calculated by computer program "
hehe...lots of bugs in that program
|
lol... ofcoarse... some of it was put in on perpose!!! I don't think the East African team of 1975 still play the game!!!
|
January 20, 2005, 12:06 AM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 12, 2004
Posts: 546
|
|
The ICC official ranking ( earlier it used to be PwC ranking) is the most scientific and accurate ranking which assesses team performance over a period of 3 years. Performance over the last one year are given the highest weightage whereas the performance weightage is 2/3rd and 1/3rd for the previous two years.
If a team has 100 points in this ranking then it means that the team stands a 50-50 chance of winning an ODI match. If a team has 50 points in this rating, it means that this team wins one out of four matches.
To take Indian performance for example, India has performed badly this year, therefore they have slipped to 8th position( their worst ever position).Before their tour to BD, they were at 100 points. After the BD tour, even though they won 2-1, their rating has slipped to 98 because of the loss in second ODI.
Here is the link for the official ranking:
http://www.icc-cricket.com/
|
January 20, 2005, 01:07 AM
|
|
BanglaCricket Staff
|
|
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 5,578
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by islam
my cricket team rankings in ODI's(do u agree?)
|
I wouldn't be as patient and defensive as many other on this thread has been to your post/ranking.. rather I hav some very offensive quetions for u!!! :
1. Who are you? What is your cricket background? What's your extent of cricket knwoledge/experience??
2. What motivated you to CREATE a ranking list of your own??
3. What is the basis & method of your ranking system and what is its justification???!
-These questions may sound like personal offence.. but these are actually some mandetory factors to be disclosed since you are talking about actually CREATING a ranking of your own!!!
Ranking is a sensitive issue and it must be done by qualified personnels... and thats why even the biggest & most accepted ranking systems disclose their own resume+methods very transperant manner... and after so many years of hard work only very recently have ICC given official recognition to the PWC rankings!!!
so either prove with all your justification that you have worked hard enough on your ranking before placing it in front of everyone's eyes... or pls just don't mess around with responsible issues like this!
Edited on, January 20, 2005, 6:10 AM GMT, by crickethorizon.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.
|
|