|
Match Archive Relive the match-time passion (Read Only) |
January 23, 2005, 10:44 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
38/1...8.4 overs
|
January 23, 2005, 10:45 PM
|
Retired BC Admin
|
|
Join Date: August 14, 2003
Location: pc near u
Posts: 8,021
|
|
46/1 after 10 overs
|
January 23, 2005, 10:46 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 27, 2004
Location: Riverside
Favorite Player: Mustafizur Rahman
Posts: 1,582
|
|
they picked rana over alok. i'd have kept kapali....but whatever.
otherwise the team looks really good.
|
January 23, 2005, 10:48 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: August 29, 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,743
|
|
Looks like we are headed for another defeat! (yeah I know it's too early to be pessimistic)
|
January 23, 2005, 10:49 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: July 19, 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,793
|
|
Cricinfo is updating the score, but no commentary. Zim run rate is close to 5!
|
January 23, 2005, 10:50 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: September 21, 2003
Location: London/Dubai
Posts: 735
|
|
Yeah can't believe cricinfo is doing this...... 2 test nations!
|
January 23, 2005, 10:51 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 24, 2004
Location: Washington DC
Favorite Player: Shakib
Posts: 1,195
|
|
if we manage to pick up a couple of wickets in the next 10 overs it will be an even contest
|
January 23, 2005, 10:51 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: July 19, 2004
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 1,793
|
|
Masri has already bowled for 6 overs; BD needs to save him for the last 10 overs
|
January 23, 2005, 10:51 PM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: August 18, 2003
Posts: 497
|
|
I dont understand the rationale for playing rana over enamul - rana is a containing bowler AT BEST, and most games he gets whacked all over the park
Selectors should the the MOM
|
January 23, 2005, 10:52 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
i cant believe that masri's best test haul is 4-60 and his ODI is 2-26...this guy gets wickets most consistantly but never piles him on. i guess u have to play against bangladesh for that rather than with them
|
January 23, 2005, 10:52 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 24, 2004
Location: Washington DC
Favorite Player: Shakib
Posts: 1,195
|
|
bold move by bashar to bring in rana with the field restrictions still on...i think this just might pay off
|
January 23, 2005, 10:54 PM
|
First Class Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 386
|
|
only mashrafi 's showing something , others are....... , i donno
|
January 23, 2005, 10:54 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 27, 2004
Location: Riverside
Favorite Player: Mustafizur Rahman
Posts: 1,582
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by paco
I dont understand the rationale for playing rana over enamul - rana is a containing bowler AT BEST, and most games he gets whacked all over the park
Selectors should the the MOM
|
enamul is in too. enamul replaced razzak and rana replaced alok. masri came in for nazmul.
|
January 23, 2005, 10:57 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
decent over from rana...only 2 off it...taps back on...hope he taps the zims into the pavilion
|
January 23, 2005, 10:58 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
taps did well
|
January 23, 2005, 10:58 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: October 24, 2004
Location: Washington DC
Favorite Player: Shakib
Posts: 1,195
|
|
gotta restrict zims within 230 to have any realistic chances of winning
|
January 23, 2005, 11:00 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2004
Location: in my room, bk
Posts: 936
|
|
gotta take wickets.....no win otherwise
|
January 23, 2005, 11:01 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2004
Location: in my room, bk
Posts: 936
|
|
52/1 after 13 overs
|
January 23, 2005, 11:02 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2004
Location: in my room, bk
Posts: 936
|
|
ops .oops: 14 overs
|
January 23, 2005, 11:06 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: June 30, 2003
Posts: 1,476
|
|
52/1 after 14 overs sux. They're gonna post a score in the high 200s!
|
January 23, 2005, 11:06 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
nah around 230 my guess
|
January 23, 2005, 11:07 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2004
Location: in my room, bk
Posts: 936
|
|
good bowling...good comeback by Tapos: joy:
|
January 23, 2005, 11:07 PM
|
Test Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: January 27, 2004
Location: Riverside
Favorite Player: Mustafizur Rahman
Posts: 1,582
|
|
hahahahaha
you guys are hard to impress..
|
January 23, 2005, 11:08 PM
|
|
ODI Cricketer
|
|
Join Date: December 9, 2004
Location: in my room, bk
Posts: 936
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by fab
52/1 after 14 overs sux. They're gonna post a score in the high 200s!
|
It's good to be optimistic but remember the loss of wicket is the most important here not the number of runs
|
January 23, 2005, 11:09 PM
|
|
Cricket Sage
|
|
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Location: New York City
Favorite Player: Mominul, Nasir, Taskin
Posts: 24,918
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by kalimdor
Quote:
Originally posted by fab
52/1 after 14 overs sux. They're gonna post a score in the high 200s!
|
It's good to be optimistic but remember the loss of wicket is the most important here not the number of runs
|
test cricket is where wickets are king...in ODI if you score at 8 an over and only bat 10 overs...u aint gonna win
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.
|
|