facebook Twitter RSS Feed YouTube StumbleUpon

Home | Forum | Chat | Tours | Articles | Pictures | News | Tools | History | Tourism | Search

 
 


Go Back   BanglaCricket Forum > Cricket > Cricket

Cricket Join fellow Tigers fans to discuss all things Cricket

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old August 22, 2009, 09:13 PM
Rifat's Avatar
Rifat Rifat is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: March 30, 2007
Location: Connecticut
Favorite Player: Abu Jayed Rahi
Posts: 15,523

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiseshah
isnt ziaur Rahman scored a blistering century in last 20/20 league? i think there are some more example

dollar's batting was good in A team or under 19 level. he made couple 50 plus innings.

i think farhad reza has potentiality of becoming true allrounder--if he gets chance

only all rounder ATM is mashrafe mortaza.
I still do not condsider Mortaza as an allrounder but a bowling allrounder...I don't see him moving at surprise #3...wait a minute...that's a brilliant Idea in T20...move him at #3 to add batting depth
Reply With Quote

  #27  
Old August 22, 2009, 11:15 PM
IanW IanW is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 2,845

The job of the bowlers is to take 20 wickets a match. The job of the Batsmen is to score 650 runs over 2 innings, leaving enough time for the bowlers to get 20 wickets. There is a very fine line between a good bowler (Masrafee) and a not-test-class one (Tapash) is pretty fine ; a bowler with 10% less pace, 10% more innacuraccuy or 10% less ability to do controled swing (*) can simply be a liability. If a quality bowler can bat, great. But dont take a second-class bowler because they can bat a bit, unless they would get selected for their batting alone. Ian Whitchurch (*) Swing gets really complicated, as the ability to only swing the ball a fraction - say, 3 inches - is absolutely lethal.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old August 22, 2009, 11:20 PM
Imteaz's Avatar
Imteaz Imteaz is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 5, 2006
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: Dale Willem Steyn
Posts: 2,481

So easy to have a world class allrounder.
__________________
Cricket is the Passion
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old August 23, 2009, 12:07 AM
magic boy magic boy is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: June 8, 2009
Posts: 3,934

a medium ace all rounder has to have some other qualification....like 100+% physical fitness....what we're seeing among the names all u have mentioned a few of them are truly as fit as an internationally recognized well medium pace all rounder. Only Mashraf can be that much strong though he's suffers from injury...and injury is the reason why he himself doesn't consider himself as all rounder and not in the way to be one perfectly. and bowling should get the first priority in case of such all rounder player.....scoring big hit is useful. ini this regard I hope Mashrafi should try to be a good all rounder as he wants to bowl well rather than hitting big. and we need him to bowl well as our specialist batsmen are now in the habit to control run scoring.not too much pressure for the lower middle order. so only if sometime requires to score useful runs then Mash can carry on. otherwise he may focus on his bowling.

But the problem is we all are looking for an all rounder like Sakib to carry the extra load after failure of our top order batsmen...when scoreboard shows 4/5 wickets gone below 100. But that shouldn't be the strategy for every match....Our top order should score so that other players can sit down calmy and get preparation for their respective job. this is pure first method of cricket. thus Australia and India earn most of the success in cricket. bat well....seeking help from the all rounder all the time doesn't look cricketing!!

My personal opinion: We should let players to play their natural game....urging too much to be an all rounder affects natural ability....we shouldn't ask every Farhad Reza to play well every match with batting+bowling!! its a pressure. without being a natural all rounder this kinda pressure kills the player.not everybody is Sakib. we should focus on strategy of the game with asking more , continuous score from our specialist batsmen n bowlers.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old August 23, 2009, 01:50 AM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,979

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rifat
Nazmul Hossain Milon
Thanks Rifat for naming Milon.His fast class and list a batting average is more than 30 first class bowling average is 15 but his List a bowling average 55?!! He is a very young guy. I think he is from our academy. So he have ample of time to improve. We hope he will do so.
So we have 3 person in the list
1)Farhad Reza
2)Nazmul Hossain Millon
3)Ziaur Rahman
Do we have any other medium pace all rounder?

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Last edited by M.H.Rubel; August 23, 2009 at 11:38 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old August 23, 2009, 03:51 AM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

most of these guys named are either bowlers who can score a few runs on a good day or bits and pieces players, none of them are really genuine allrounders.

two other names to mention are sajidul and delwar hossain, but again, not really genuine allrounders.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old August 23, 2009, 03:59 AM
Murad's Avatar
Murad Murad is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: July 30, 2006
Favorite Player: MAM & MBM
Posts: 19,850

WE don't have any genuine allrounders in Bangladesh except Shakib.

Riyad is so-so in both bowling and batting. Naeem is more of a batsman who can bowl a bit.

Reza is a good bowler who can bat a bit ( He bat well in Domestic leagues though ).

Ziaur is also a so-so bowler who can bat a bit.

So yeah.. Gowza is right. We don't have any genuine allrounders!!
__________________
~*Islam is the only way to attain peace in life, be it personal, family or political.*~
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old August 23, 2009, 04:01 AM
raf-stah raf-stah is offline
Club Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 29, 2009
Posts: 159

dont even have to be a medium pacer all rounder- 3 pacers is wat we need. sipnners shudnt have to bowl close to 40
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old August 23, 2009, 05:14 AM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,979

Why we need a medium pace all rounder for our ODI team? Lets look at the bowling line up 1.Mash
2.Russel 3.Sakib 4.Razzak work of 5th bowler is done by both Rhiyadh and Nayeem both r spinner if we have a medium pace all rounder replacing Nayeem then its will be a good ODI bowling attack. 3 Pacer 3 Spinner and this bowling attack will work even in bouncy wicket like england.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old August 24, 2009, 08:24 AM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,979

Then probably following guys can meet up the need or medium pace all rounder
1)Farhad Reza
2)Sajidul
3)Nazmul Hossain Milon
4)Delwar Hossain
5)Ziaur
Now we will have to wait for the performance of these guys and to be selected for national ODI team or for some one new.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

Last edited by M.H.Rubel; August 25, 2009 at 12:12 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old August 24, 2009, 09:59 PM
yaseer's Avatar
yaseer yaseer is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 29, 2004
Location: Brisbane
Favorite Player: Rafique & Pailot
Posts: 6,335

Quote:
Originally Posted by M.H.Rubel
1)Farhad Reza
2)Nazmul Hossain Millon
3)Ziaur Rahman
Do we have any other medium pace all rounder?

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
These are bits n pieces cricketers, not all-rounders.

They neither guarantee to bowl 10 overs in ODI, nor can play any substantial knock.
These type of players never going to have a career in national team. They can come, play some matches and then be removed. We have seen these players in past too; Mofijur Rahman Munna, Mushfiqur Rahman Babu and even Sujon (best bits n pieces we have so far). Obviously is Test cricket, they never going to play any part at all.

What we need is a genuine Bowler. If the Bowler can bat a bit, that is added bonus. Already have Riyad, Nayeem, Mehrab, Robin (potentail), who can't bowl 10 overs in an ODI, don't want to make this list long.

Genuine pace bowler dorkar re bhai.......
Shubhashis? Sumon Saha? Shafaq al Jabir? Robiul? Who is next?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old August 24, 2009, 10:09 PM
fuzzy's Avatar
fuzzy fuzzy is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: May 26, 2006
Location: Near WAGA WAGA
Favorite Player: Mashrafee and Enamul jr
Posts: 1,350

dollar mahmud is pretty good with the bat...mahbubal we have seen wat he could do with the vs zim... probably we can use them T-20..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old August 24, 2009, 11:40 PM
Gowza Gowza is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Australia
Favorite Player: Mike Procter
Posts: 12,273

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaseer
These are bits n pieces cricketers, not all-rounders.

They neither guarantee to bowl 10 overs in ODI, nor can play any substantial knock.
These type of players never going to have a career in national team. They can come, play some matches and then be removed. We have seen these players in past too; Mofijur Rahman Munna, Mushfiqur Rahman Babu and even Sujon (best bits n pieces we have so far). Obviously is Test cricket, they never going to play any part at all.

What we need is a genuine Bowler. If the Bowler can bat a bit, that is added bonus. Already have Riyad, Nayeem, Mehrab, Robin (potentail), who can't bowl 10 overs in an ODI, don't want to make this list long.

Genuine pace bowler dorkar re bhai.......
Shubhashis? Sumon Saha? Shafaq al Jabir? Robiul? Who is next?
i think they should invest some more time and effort into sajidul, BD just don't have many pacers who can consistently bowl 130kph+ and swing the ball, plus he can play the occassional decent knock. when sajidul toured england people over there were impressed with him, i can't understand why the selectors aren't giving him more opportunities.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old August 25, 2009, 01:41 AM
nobody nobody is offline
ODI Cricketer
 
Join Date: August 10, 2006
Posts: 544

Since the demise of Botham England is searching one. I do not consider Flinthof as allrounder (basic criteria Batting Av> Bowling Av does not fit) The great WI and Aussi teams of 70s and 90s did not have any allrounder. But that did not prevent them being the best team of the world (Ok aus has one in Gilly). But England team have so many bits and piece allrounder (pringle, capel, Holliaoke etc in reality they were neither bowler nor batsman) in 1990s; they were at the bottom. We need six World Class Batsmen and Four World Class bowlers with a decent WK ( A wk on par with Boucher in keeping ability ; batting is bonus). Unfortunately we have only one bowler who could compete with the best and batsmen are developing atm.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old August 25, 2009, 01:45 AM
Eshen's Avatar
Eshen Eshen is offline
Cricket Guru
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Posts: 14,497

Instead of looking for something that we don't have, we need to figure out how to work with what we got.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old August 25, 2009, 04:02 AM
cricket_king's Avatar
cricket_king cricket_king is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 10, 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,870

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazal
And I guarantee that if he get chance again, he will prove you wrong again. And that is based on his past record of him in the team.
Firstly, he hasn't proven me wrong about anything yet. Secondly, though I agree with the fact that it's slightly early to write him off, I don't see how his past record indicates any success in the near future. Debutants who end up like Farhad usually score a few 'flash in the pan' scores against some quality opposition, and then fade away. Farhad's batting average against decent opposition is embarrassing to say the least, and he's had a few opportunities to score some runs down the order, but in the end failed in most matches, though, so did the rest of the team. His couple of notable innings came against Zimbabwe and Kenya, but that was at the start of his career when he was picked for good form.

Quoting Rifat bhai from the 'Next debutant' thread:

Quote:
Form is temporary, class is permanent. Usually what happens is the the Players enjoy amazing form but by the time they arrive at the national team, the form deteriorates and we see their average class and then the truth is exposed! That player simply doesn't belong with the elite teams...
Farhad simply doesn't belong either IMO.
__________________
A friend in need is a friend indeed; a friend with weed is better.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old August 25, 2009, 04:07 PM
chol_bd123 chol_bd123 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: July 30, 2009
Location: ALbany, NY
Favorite Player: TAmim + Ash
Posts: 1,638

Why medium pace? I want a genuine fast bowler like Bret Lee.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old August 25, 2009, 08:12 PM
jeesh jeesh is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: January 4, 2005
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 4,093

Quote:
Originally Posted by chol_bd123
Why medium pace? I want a genuine fast bowler like Bret Lee.
Thats the problem. We are hoping for a express pace bowler to come and solve all our trouble. I would be happy with a medium pacer like Kulasekara or Vaas. We dont need pace, we need a bowler who can bowl consistently with discipline.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old August 26, 2009, 11:56 AM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,979

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaseer
These are bits n pieces cricketers, not all-rounders.

They neither guarantee to bowl 10 overs in ODI, nor can play any substantial knock.
These type of players never going to have a career in national team. They can come, play some matches and then be removed. We have seen these players in past too; Mofijur Rahman Munna, Mushfiqur Rahman Babu and even Sujon (best bits n pieces we have so far). Obviously is Test cricket, they never going to play any part at all.

What we need is a genuine Bowler. If the Bowler can bat a bit, that is added bonus. Already have Riyad, Nayeem, Mehrab, Robin (potentail), who can't bowl 10 overs in an ODI, don't want to make this list long.

Genuine pace bowler dorkar re bhai.......
Shubhashis? Sumon Saha? Shafaq al Jabir? Robiul? Who is next?
The names i have mentioned earlier among them SAJIDUL,NAZMUL(MILON),AND DELOWAR have a very good first class career.Each of them have good batting ability as well. So i can see potentiliaty to be a good all rounder on them,their endever will tell their fate. On the other hand Forhads first class batting career is excellent and he was rapidly improving his bowling.Its not impossible for him to be Lanse Clusener of Bangladesh,Effective in shorter version of matches.We dont know who will succd but what we know is we need a pace all rounder.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old August 26, 2009, 12:03 PM
One World One World is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: May 18, 2005
Location: New England
Favorite Player: Mominul Haque
Posts: 24,706

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaseer
These are bits n pieces cricketers, not all-rounders.

They neither guarantee to bowl 10 overs in ODI, nor can play any substantial knock.
These type of players never going to have a career in national team. They can come, play some matches and then be removed. We have seen these players in past too; Mofijur Rahman Munna, Mushfiqur Rahman Babu and even Sujon (best bits n pieces we have so far). Obviously is Test cricket, they never going to play any part at all.

What we need is a genuine Bowler. If the Bowler can bat a bit, that is added bonus. Already have Riyad, Nayeem, Mehrab, Robin (potentail), who can't bowl 10 overs in an ODI, don't want to make this list long.
Good post.
__________________
À vaincre sans péril, on triomphe sans gloire.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old August 26, 2009, 12:50 PM
bujhee kom's Avatar
bujhee kom bujhee kom is offline
Cricket Savant
 
Join Date: June 27, 2007
Location: Dhaka Mental Hospital
Favorite Player: Jahanara Alam, Zuccarello
Posts: 25,243

Yeah bros, no doubt, I agree, I also need a Medium-fast All-rounder accomplish/accomplish level for my Mental Hospital!
__________________
God bless Ingrid Newkirk, Dianne Feinstein, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren & Mitch Landrieu!
twitter.com/bujheekom
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old August 26, 2009, 12:53 PM
nycpro96's Avatar
nycpro96 nycpro96 is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Favorite Player: Tamim Iqbal
Posts: 6,063

We don't need any express bowler. I think we need a pacer who can bowl with pace around 80-85. I think that is enough if he can bowl a consistent line and length. He needs to be able to bowl in the blockhole and has to good variations.
__________________
Reporter: You could hit the first ball for 4 couldn't you?
Tamim: Ha, I could hit the first ball for 6, that's not a problem.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old August 26, 2009, 12:57 PM
Fazal's Avatar
Fazal Fazal is offline
Cricket Sage
 
Join Date: September 16, 2004
Posts: 18,718

BK bhai,

Here is your Medium-fast All-rounders for your Mental Hospital

__________________
"Make Bangladesh Cricket Great Again"
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old October 10, 2009, 09:37 AM
M.H.Rubel M.H.Rubel is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: August 18, 2009
Location: Dhaka
Favorite Player: All Bangladeshi players
Posts: 5,979

Quote:
Originally Posted by M.H.Rubel
Then probably following guys can meet up the need or medium pace all rounder
1)Farhad Reza
2)Sajidul
3)Nazmul Hossain Milon
4)Delwar Hossain
5)Ziaur
Now we will have to wait for the performance of these guys and to be selected for national ODI team or for some one new.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Names i have mentioned earlier,Delwar and Sajidul has not been selectes for the A team.Farhad is on cooling period.
Ziaur and Nazmul Milon is touring Maharastra with A team.Out of my list Dollar is also touring Maharastra and he is not doing bad there.Ziaur is also doing good there.It seems to me that ultimately Ziaur,Dollar along with Farhad will be the main competitor for this place this year but there is a chance that we may find some new candidates after this domestic season as well ?

Posted via BC Mobile Edition
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old October 10, 2009, 10:17 AM
fais fais is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Location: UK
Favorite Player: Shakib Al Hasan
Posts: 1,200

i think Nazmul and Dollar could be quite effective and we need to try them on some pace friendly tracks
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
BanglaCricket.com
 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Partner Sites | Useful Links | Banners |

© BanglaCricket