How do you expect us to win when umpires are against us

playmaker · #1 March 16, 2012, 04:05 AM

In the 1st ODI if lullah wasnt given out, we couldve won the match easily

this match(VS india), Kohli was totally plumb.

From now on any partiality towards a strong team is absolutely unacceptable esp. when it gomes against us.

Shaun petr · #2 March 16, 2012, 04:28 AM

you are right buddy. I just can't take this anymore. We always have these agent umpires from India and Australia. What they are up to i don't know.

Posted via BC Mobile Edition

playmaker · #3 March 16, 2012, 04:30 AM

Attention mods: I made a type, it shud be "How" not "Hwo"

Purbasha T · #4 March 16, 2012, 07:00 AM

To be honest, it was a bit on the higher side. Even DRS might not have changed the decision if 50%+ of the ball was found to be missing the stumps.

But we need the DRS, no doubt about that.

AMD128 · #5 March 16, 2012, 07:00 AM

I guess we've but no choice to go for DRS. WE NEED IT more then other teams do. Do hope BCB would opt for DRS pretty soon. Maybe in our next home series.

playmaker · #6 March 16, 2012, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purbasha T
To be honest, it was a bit on the higher side. Even DRS might not have changed the decision if 50%+ of the ball was found to be missing the stumps.

But we need the DRS, no doubt about that.

Nope, the ball was completely hitting ths stump, and to add to that the ball was plumb while kohli was on the backfoot, went on to make a lot of runs

Antora · #7 March 16, 2012, 07:05 AM

If Kholi had been out for a duck, the whole game could've been so different

kalpurush · #8 March 16, 2012, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by playmaker
Attention mods: I made a type, it shud be "How" not "Hwo"

Done!

WE have another thread for the same topic though. I am going to merge the threads later on.

playmaker · #9 March 16, 2012, 07:16 AM

^^^
Ok, though I know there are some srs Umpire bashing threads, can merge with them

playmaker · #10 March 16, 2012, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antora
If Kholi had been out for a duck, the whole game could've been so different

Dhoni and the lower batsman didnt look too comfortable. had kohli gone out then india would struggle to get to even 250

Tigers_eye · #11 March 16, 2012, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PoorFan
MF Thired umpire robbed Shakib!

I am not watching. Was he notout?

al Furqaan · #12 March 16, 2012, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigers_eye
I am not watching. Was he notout?

Different angles showed different things. My gut says he was indeed OUT, but if this was the other team, he would have stayed put.

shakibrulz · #13 March 16, 2012, 11:11 AM

Benefit of doubt surely should have gone to the batsman, looked 50/50 to me.

al-Sagar · #14 March 16, 2012, 11:15 AM

UMPIRE o ajke MOM ke out koire haraite parlo na .....

ekhon theke ebhabei amra jitbo

playmaker · #15 March 16, 2012, 11:25 AM

had the decisions gone in favour of us...we couldve won the match by 40 overs = bonus point

(hey Im talking abt kohli and shakib's decision....)

*optimism*

mufi_02 · #16 March 16, 2012, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by al Furqaan
Different angles showed different things. My gut says he was indeed OUT, but if this was the other team, he would have stayed put.

I disagree. In all the angles except one, his feet was on the white line. Now I don't know, isn't white line considered safe too? If yes, then he was DEF in.

jeesh · #17 March 16, 2012, 11:41 AM

Shakibs decision was a very harsh one. Indian batsman=benefit of doubt.

Shubho · #18 March 16, 2012, 11:45 AM

Suck it up, guys. Bad umpiring decisions against weaker teams is a fact of life. We have to live with it. Have got to prove our worth in spite of it. If you don't play like sissies, you can overcome even such blatant obstacles.

BASSMAN · #19 March 16, 2012, 11:50 AM

The Shakib out was very unlucky....even on this rare occasion cricinfo commies said it was unlucky.

The 3rd umpire was from Sri Lanka.....another Arvinda De Silva in the making???

Navo · #20 March 16, 2012, 11:57 AM

^ you mean Ashoka de Silva, Bassman

shakibrulz · #21 March 16, 2012, 11:57 AM

Quote:

Ashwin to Shakib Al Hasan, OUT, 81.7 kph, Tough call for the umpire! Ashwin gets some sharp turn that beats the left-hander, Shakib was a long way forward, Dhoni was very confident, and I think Shakib was a touch unlucky here! The benefit of the doubt should have gone to the batsman, a part of his boot was on the line but one angle suggested a part of it was behind the crease when the bail was off the groove, Bangladesh have to move on now

If it's on the line it's out - but such 50-50 decisions should be adjudged in favor of the batsman - that's the rule.

Beamer · #22 March 16, 2012, 12:00 PM

Shakib was robbed. There was no conclusive evidence, and such the batsman should have got the benefit of doubt. But, its a mute point now. We did it despite..

zman · #23 March 16, 2012, 06:13 PM

Ans. SHAKIB & CO. JUST SHOWED THE WHOLE WORLD HOW IT'S DONE

Dilscoop · #24 March 16, 2012, 07:37 PM

It would be lot simpler if the lines were just a bit thicker and if the lines didn't "belong to the umpire." It would make it easier on everyone, specially for the umps. But of course ICC won't realize it.

Touching the line, you are safe.

Biggus · #25 March 16, 2012, 08:01 PM

Don't complain about the umpiring guys or you'll end up sounding like the really bad Indian fans. Anyone who's done it knows how tough it is. I've seen the replays and they could have gone either way. Last night they went against you and on another day they will go in your favour. Such is life! This is cricket guys, not some other sport, and we must all (fans included) accept the umpires decision. If we're not prepared to do so we should go and play or follow some other sport where good grace and dignity are not considered worthwhile.