View Single Post
  #1  
Old May 22, 2019, 11:45 AM
ma_o_mati's Avatar
ma_o_mati ma_o_mati is offline
Test Cricketer
 
Join Date: September 4, 2008
Posts: 1,375
Default Does tailenders batting at the end make game less interesting?

I was watching a match the other day on on Willow tv. The team chasing lost 6 wickets and had a target that was beyond reach of their tailenders. The game was pretty much over. The result is known, its agony for spectators to continue sit through on such games.

Instead of having all the bowlers batting at the end, why don’t ICC make a rule of mixing it up. Top and middle order batsman has to bat with a tailender. That way the game will have batsman till the 10th wickets. In that way, it can truly be glorious game of uncertainty. Even if you lose 5/6 wickets, u know there are still batsman who can win it. It will also encourage bowlers to bat better I think.

What you guys think? I am tired of these games dying halfway.
__________________
o se shopno diye toiri se desh
Sriti diye ghera: amar-jonmovumi
Reply With Quote