View Single Post
  #1  
Old September 29, 2003, 10:26 AM
Tintin Tintin is offline
Moderator
BC Editorial Team
 
Join Date: August 23, 2003
Posts: 3,493
Default Faster Connection - Bangladesh Cricket Records

A lost thread which I happen to have a copy of in the cache

========================

Fwullah

Faster Connection - Bangladesh Cricket Records

I just found a site which is faster than Cricinfo's Bangladesh sites, and also does not have many advertisements on the sites.

Although there is nothing new - its just a copy-paste of the Bangladesh cricket stats of Cricinfo, but I think the connection to go to this site is much faster.

And the site is also updated - upto Bangaldesh's last tour of Pakistan.

It is -

CricketArchive http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk

============================

chinaman

First Class Cricketer

Posts 309
Registered 14-8-2003
Location NY
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 29-9-2003 at 06:24 AM

Tintin's faborite hangout.

============================

Kalbaisakhi

First Class Cricketer
Posts 356
Registered 6-8-2003
Location dhaka,Bangladesh
Member Is Online

Mood:

posted on 29-9-2003 at 07:26 AM

Hey cricketnext is also fast then any other cricket web sight.

http://www.cricketnext.com

============================

Carte Blanche

Club Cricketer
Posts 89
Registered 14-9-2003
Location North Pole
Member Is Offline

Mood: Nai

posted on 29-9-2003 at 07:52 AM

Yes Kalbaisakhi cricket next is faster than any other web sights I have seen. By the way, have you ever visited www.stfu.net by any chance?

============================

Kalbaisakhi

First Class Cricketer
Posts 356
Registered 6-8-2003
Location dhaka,Bangladesh
Member Is Online

Mood:

posted on 29-9-2003 at 08:00 AM

Sorry carta not yet.

What kind of web sight it is?

============================

Tintin

Club Cricketer
Posts 107
Registered 23-8-2003
Location Boast On, USA
Member Is Online

Mood:

posted on 29-9-2003 at 09:34 AM

As a cricket archive fan, a few comments :

When it comes to international CI is much more comprehensive, but for first class cricket statistics CA is better. First, CI's fc scorecards are largely incomplete, many older scorecards as well as more recent ones (like Pakistani fcc) are missing. Then CA is faster, and has got a neater interface.

But the feature that seperates CA from CI is its 'player oracle' feature which allows you to place queries on first class cricketers. If you want to know, for eg, how Nafis Iqbal has done in fcc or List A matches, this is about the only thing available in the net for it.

Player Oracle http://www.cricketarchive.co.uk/cgi-...yer_oracle.cgi (use the detailed stats option).

Tintin

[Edited on 29-9-2003 by Tintin]
Reply With Quote