'your' only explanation is just that. it has no connection to reality. India is one of the countries that has suffered the most due to poor umpiring and biased match referee decisions. your charges are not only utterly false but laughable as well.
why nimbus doesn't pay for it you should talk to their CEO and shareholders. it is patently unfair for ICC to expect broadcasters to pay for these tech. ICC gets its own hefty payment for tournaments like the world cup from broadcasters like nimbus, why should they pay for the tech as well ?
it's only you who is making asinine comments 'hawk eye is the real UDRS'. every cricketer from dhoni to mahela jawabardhane (do you know who that is ? do you at all know what cricket is and who plays it?) has said that they prefer the whole UDRS package.
but then, you are not a cricketer. you will say anything and make up even odder theories if it allows you to cuss against BCCI.
Quote:
|
Had UDRS been used in the SA-Ind series, India wouldn't have won the Durban test match where THREE crucial decisions went against SA.
|
perhaps you haven't watched the full match. 2-3 decisions went against India as well.
India would have won a series in australia if not for bad umpiring.