February 3, 2013, 08:12 AM
|
 |
Cricket Guru
T20 WC 2010 Fantasy Winner
|
|
Join Date: June 18, 2005
Location: Canada
Favorite Player: ABD / Kalam / Musta
Posts: 9,787
|
|
| Eastern | DIV | GP | W | L | OT | P | ROW | GF | GA | Diff | Home | Away | S/O | L10 | Streak |
|---|
| 1 | * - Boston | NE | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 24 | 19 | +5 | 4-1-0 | 2-0-1 | 2-0 | 6-1-1 | Won 1 | | 2 | * - Tampa Bay | SE | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 6 | 39 | 21 | +18 | 5-1-0 | 1-1-0 | - | 6-2-0 | Lost 1 | | 3 | * - Pittsburgh | ATL | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 4 | 24 | 19 | +5 | 1-2-0 | 4-1-0 | 1-0 | 5-3-0 | Won 2 | | 4 | Ottawa | NE | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 24 | 14 | +10 | 3-0-1 | 2-2-0 | 0-1 | 5-2-1 | Lost 1 | | 5 | Montréal | NE | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 24 | 16 | +8 | 4-1-0 | 1-1-0 | - | 5-2-0 | Won 1 | | 6 | NY Islanders | ATL | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 27 | 23 | +4 | 1-1-0 | 3-1-1 | - | 4-2-1 | Won 2 | | 7 | New Jersey | ATL | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 2-0-1 | 1-1-2 | 0-1 | 3-1-3 | Lost 1 | | 8 | Toronto | NE | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 21 | 23 | -2 | 1-3-0 | 3-1-0 | - | 4-4-0 | Lost 1 |
| | 9 | NY Rangers | ATL | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 3-2-0 | 1-2-0 | - | 4-4-0 | Won 1 | | 10 | Buffalo | NE | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 24 | 29 | -5 | 1-1-1 | 2-3-0 | - | 3-4-1 | Lost 1 | | 11 | Winnipeg | SE | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 24 | 32 | -8 | 2-1-0 | 1-3-1 | 0-1 | 3-4-1 | Lost 3 | | 12 | Carolina | SE | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 18 | 23 | -5 | 2-2-0 | 1-2-0 | - | 3-4-0 | Lost 1 | | 13 | Philadelphia | ATL | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 21 | 26 | -5 | 2-1-0 | 1-5-0 | - | 3-6-0 | Won 1 | | 14 | Washington | SE | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 27 | -9 | 2-2-0 | 0-3-1 | - | 2-5-1 | Won 1 | | 15 | Florida | SE | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 27 | -11 | 2-2-0 | 0-3-0 | - | 2-5-0 | Won 1 |
| Western | DIV | GP | W | L | OT | P | ROW | GF | GA | Diff | Home | Away | S/O | L10 | Streak |
|---|
| 1 | * - Chicago | CEN | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 6 | 28 | 20 | +8 | 2-0-0 | 5-0-2 | 1-2 | 7-0-2 | Won 1 | | 2 | * - San Jose | PAC | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 30 | 14 | +16 | 5-0-1 | 2-0-0 | 2-1 | 7-0-1 | OT 1 | | 3 | * - Vancouver | NW | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 21 | 20 | +1 | 3-1-1 | 1-1-1 | 2-2 | 4-2-2 | Won 2 | | 4 | St. Louis | CEN | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 31 | 19 | +12 | 3-0-0 | 3-2-0 | 1-0 | 6-2-0 | Lost 1 | | 5 | Anaheim | PAC | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 27 | 22 | +5 | 3-1-0 | 2-0-1 | 1-1 | 5-1-1 | Won 2 | | 6 | Detroit | CEN | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 3-1-0 | 1-2-1 | 1-0 | 4-3-1 | Lost 1 | | 7 | Edmonton | NW | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 2-1-0 | 2-2-1 | 1-1 | 4-3-1 | Lost 1 | | 8 | Minnesota | NW | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 20 | 22 | -2 | 4-1-0 | 0-2-1 | 1-0 | 4-3-1 | Lost 1 |
| | 9 | Nashville | CEN | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 14 | 20 | -6 | 0-0-2 | 3-2-1 | 2-3 | 3-2-3 | Won 2 | | 10 | Colorado | NW | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 3-0-0 | 1-4-0 | - | 4-4-0 | Won 2 | | 11 | Phoenix | PAC | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 26 | +1 | 3-2-1 | 0-2-1 | 0-1 | 3-4-2 | Won 1 | | 12 | Dallas | PAC | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 17 | 23 | -6 | 2-1-1 | 1-4-0 | 1-0 | 3-5-1 | Lost 1 | | 13 | Columbus | CEN | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 18 | 28 | -10 | 2-2-1 | 1-3-0 | 1-1 | 3-5-1 | Won 1 | | 14 | Los Angeles | PAC | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 1-1-1 | 1-2-1 | 1-1 | 2-3-2 | Lost 1 | | 15 | Calgary | NW | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 24 | -8 | 1-3-1 | 0-0-1 | 0-2 | 1-3-2 | OT 1 |
__________________
Armchair selectors name their XI and conduct heated selection meetings on internet. Blood young players, some experts cry. Pick the best players, regardless of age, insist others. 
|