Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chinaman
In other words, are you implying to follow the US model?
If I'm not mistaken, Parliamentary Govt was installed over the Presidential one in a bid to prevent the military to take over the power. Remember the fall of Ershad?
|
Well in a sense i am implying to follow the US model.
I do not know much about the political system during ershads rule. Was he elected the president? And why would that system be more susceptible to military take over as opposed to the current system. What I feel is that there was a lack of democracy at that time which lead to military rule. In the system i m propsing all the branches will be eleted and the legislative branches will not be involved in the planning of development. I doubt this was the case during ershad.