Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sohel NR
There are countries where such separation exists by law, and advocacy groups that protect the letter and and the spirit of the law. Adding an extra layer by actually advocating atheism in the name "scientific proof" is as bad as the attempt to use "scientific proof" to to promote a religious agenda. Religion(s), meaning ALL religions should be taught separately in public schools as a part of our history and heritage as human beings, covering multiple perspectives including religious ones.
|
Are you saying that teaching the scientific proof in the theory of evolution is akin to advocating atheism?
I agree - school curricula SHOULD include religious studies from a historical perspective. But they must NOT be taught as science, because they most definitely are not. That is what Dawkins and his like are advocating. There are no secret Atheist agenda to eradicate religion, but if teaching science in schools happens to erode faith, then that's a matter that should be addressed by mosques/temples/churches/synagogues.