View Single Post
  #15  
Old November 2, 2008, 04:26 PM
Dhakablues's Avatar
Dhakablues Dhakablues is offline
Cricket Legend
 
Join Date: December 25, 2004
Location: EverGreen State, USA
Favorite Player: Mashrafee
Posts: 4,280

Putting a band-aid to the deep-rooted problem wont work. Banning players for 10 years and banning the transmission wouldnt do anything but only make it even more popular. Players left BD cricket because of their uncertainity over national team created by the moron selectors, abnormaly peculiar board members, a Gadha national manager and an inexperienced shrewd captain/coach. There was money and fame on one side,, the other was ignomy, left out of national team, called 'old and useless", ignored by national media...

Siddons afraid of ICL,,Why dont BCB negotiate with ICL? I mean,, who said that ICL was the "untouchable" other than Indian board? ICL never said that it has boned the players for 3 years and wouldnt talk to anyone. And relying on Indian board? Look what they did to Srilanka.. pulled the plug the moment Ranatunga showed dissent. We dont need India,, because Pakistan, SA, NZ, Zimb, WI, Srilanka are all supporters of BD cricket. It as only England and Australia who opposed BD's test stats and still cant get over their defeat in that voting. Bangladesh doesnt need India's approval on everything when we dont rely on their support to run our board.

Yes, India is a strong nation and has all the power in world cricket,, but that doesnt mean that we have to sell our souls to them and BCB becomes the slave of Indian Cricket. BCB should have the "honest courage" ( instead of using foul language) to confront BCCI and negotiate with ICL about the players. Besides, ICL has, in its contracts, that players are free to leave on naional duties.. Then what is the problem?
Reply With Quote