Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tiger1000
Sarkar is an opener and he was played in that slot, his problem was with form, Sabbir isn't in bad form, it just isn't his position.
Those days of 'tuk tuk' isn't the reason we need a sabbir in 3
I'd much rather be 200/3 after 40 overs than 230/7 after 40
|
To me those days of either 200/3 or 230/7 are over. To me if you want a competitive team, neither is acceptable. 250+ will not give too many wins now a days. To win consistently you need to target 290+ and that means you need to take care of the RR in all phases of game. We rarely scored 200 in 40 overs anyway, and therefore your example is flawed in a way.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tiger1000
And that's not even true with Sabbir at 3,its idiotic beyond belief
|
No, Sabbir @ #3 is not idiotic. Its experimental which may work or not.
Do you know what is idiotic? Its the constant whining about a young player with full of potential without giving him enough chance. Where were you when Ashraful, Rahim, Riyad was all having lower Average than Sabbir at this time of their career?
This kind of whinning is itself idiotic at its best.
Trust on the coach, and wait how it works out before complaining too much about young payers. And trust me more than often you will be rewarded as a fan.