Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blah
That's your assesment of a good player. But if they don't perform in games, where it matters, can you actually call them good players? Calling them "good players" is a relative term, it's only a fact if they actually perform.
Who are you calling a core of good players?
These people suck at playing cricket, that why we are loose games. Whats wrong with you?
They are not "good players" in any extend of imagination. More than 90% avg less than 30, Only one player gets called up for IPL; thats what they think about our good players. None of the players in the current corp will even get chance to play for any other team inthe world, if they begged their life for it. They don't even get a callup to play for english country premier league.
What good players?
|
What these core players could have done in another team settings is a completely different proposition. It's not even the point of discussion here.
As Eshen pointed out, these core players in Bangladesh's setting have won 1 matches out of every 6 matches against top 8 teams and have won every other matches against Associates and Zimbabwe.
Siddons started with these bunch of players, and he is failing to get any results. Period.