Sir auditor, this has the potential to be a front pager.
Could you expand on the reasoning for some of the grades assigned? For example, Shahadat gets a B+ with no comments.
Also, for bowlers, perhaps provide the bowling averages as grade indicators?
Personally, I have a few issues with the grading. Enam's F based on one innings in one match is perhaps too harsh. A data point of one is not enough to grade. A spinning strike bowler sent in to bowl in a pitch that had nothing for the spinners. Note that the pacers got 7 of the 8 wickets.